Evan Katz
I think it’s safe to say 2020 has been a year for the history books. The COVID-19 pandemic, the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor that sparked widespread protests for racial justice, President Donald Trump’s acquittal, and a World War III scare are just a few of the wild events that have taken place this year. And we’re only halfway through. We still have a presidential election coming up in a few months.
At the moment, presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden is the favorite to win and make Trump a one-term president. But in a year where Murphy’s Law reigns supreme, what happens if November’s presidential election doesn’t produce a decisive winner? Even worse, what happens if it ends up tied at 269, something that could possibly happen given the way the electoral map is configured? What more fitting way to end 2020 than with a major constitutional crisis?
Here’s one wacky possibility: in a perfect storm, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi could end up becoming Acting President of the United States in 2021. I have to stress that this would be extremely unlikely, but given everything else going on, I feel like it’s a fascinating scenario worth exploring in some depth. Here’s how it could happen:
1. Biden and Trump tie in the Electoral College, forcing a contingent election
As of early July, Biden appears to hold a double-digit lead over Trump nationally and is leading in several key swing states. This bodes well for Democrats come November, but the specter of 2016 still lurks in many people’s minds. Biden’s lead is both larger and more durable than Clinton’s at this time four years ago, but Trump could very well make up some ground over the next four months and win the Electoral College while losing the popular vote.
Suppose Trump narrows the gap between now and Election Day to about four points nationally. Maybe job numbers improve and the number of new COVID-19 cases dips, inspiring some confidence. Maybe Biden emerges from his basement and has a series of gaffes on the campaign trail that cause him to stumble down the stretch. In this scenario, a combination of factors—and maybe some funny business with voting machines and mail-in ballots—leads Trump to perform better than expected in Florida, North Carolina, Arizona, and Wisconsin. However, Biden still flips Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Maine’s 2nd congressional district. The resulting map would look like this:

Per the Twelfth and Twentieth Amendments, in the event that neither Trump nor Biden receives an absolute majority of electoral votes (at least 270), the newly elected 117th Congress would go into session to select both the president and vice president in separate contingent elections. Such elections have only happened three times in American history: 1800, 1824, and 1836.
2. Contingent election stalls in the House as Florida’s state delegation flips
To select the president, the House of Representatives would vote en bloc in state delegations, with each state receiving one vote. The District of Columbia, which doesn’t have voting representation in either chamber, wouldn’t receive a vote. The majority of members in a delegation must vote for a single candidate for the state’s vote to count toward the final tally, otherwise the state is marked as “divided.” A candidate must receive an absolute majority of states (26) in the House of Representatives to be elected. In the event that no candidate receives a majority of states, the process would continue on successive ballots until one does. In the 116th Congress, 26 state delegations have Republican majorities, 22 have Democratic majorities, and two are divided (though Michigan has a Democratic plurality since Justin Amash left the Republican Party in 2019).

If the above partisan breakdown were to remain the same in the 117th Congress, Trump would likely win the majority of state delegations and would subsequently be reelected. However, there are two swing states—Florida and Wisconsin—with slim Republican majorities in their House delegations that could be candidates to flip. Florida, which currently has 14 Republicans and 13 Democrats, would only need to have one seat to flip to move over to the Democratic column, while Wisconsin, which has 5 Republicans and 3 Democrats, would need one seat to flip to become divided.
The composition of Wisconsin’s House delegation will likely stay the way it is given that its House districts are all considered safe. The same is true for those safe GOP states with at-large representation: Alaska, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Florida, however, has several competitive districts. For example, Florida’s 15th district, which includes the city of Lakeland and suburbs of Tampa, is a traditionally Republican district with embattled Republican Ross Spano as its representative. But it also has plenty of the kind of suburban voters that Trump has been hemorrhaging since 2016. With a Cook PVI of only R+6 and an incumbent facing an ethics probe, FL-15 is a possible candidate to flip blue, even if Florida ultimately remains in the Republican column at the presidential level.
In the scenario where FL-15 flips, assuming that Florida, Pennsylvania, and Michigan don’t lose any Democratic seats and states like Arizona, Colorado, Iowa, and Minnesota lose no more than one, Republicans would have majorities in no more than 25 state delegations. If each member of Congress voted along party lines, neither Trump nor Biden would win on the first ballot, requiring successive ballots until enough representatives flip to produce a winner.
The key here is that the House would need to remain gridlocked beyond noon on January 20, 2021—the official end of Trump’s first term—for an acting president to take power. Normally, the incoming vice president would assume the role of acting president if the House couldn’t elect a president by Inauguration Day. But what happens if the Senate also fails to elect a vice president?
3. Democrats gain three net seats in the Senate to force a 50–50 tie

Republicans currently have a Senate majority with 53 seats. Democrats control 47 seats (two independents caucus with them). To win back the majority, Democrats would need to pick up a net three seats, assuming Biden wins and his vice president can break the tie, or four seats if not. Because Democrat Doug Jones is trying to defend his seat in deep red Alabama, his reelection prospects aren’t exactly great, so Democrats probably have to flip at least four seats from among competitive races in Arizona, Colorado, Georgia (x2), Iowa, Maine, Montana, North Carolina, and (possibly) Texas to win a majority.
But in this scenario, enough Democratic senate candidates outperform Biden in these traditionally Republican or Republican-leaning states to produce a 50–50 tie in the country’s upper chamber.
Here’s where it gets interesting: because of the tied electoral map, the Senate would be charged with selecting the vice president from the top two electoral-vote-getters—in this case, Mike Pence and Biden’s running mate. Unlike in the House, the individual senators each have a vote, and a candidate must receive a majority of votes to become vice president as per the Twelfth Amendment.
Since the Senate of the 117th Congress would be evenly split, neither vice presidential candidate would win on the first ballot. There remains some ambiguity as to whether the sitting vice president—i.e. Mike Pence—would be able to break a tie. Indeed, the topic came up in 2000 during the Bush–Gore controversy, which also featured an evenly divided Senate. That in itself would spark a constitutional crisis. If the Senate couldn’t name a legitimate vice president to act as president by January 20, 2021, the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 dictates that Speaker Pelosi would act as president until the House resolved the contingent election for president or the Senate picked a vice president to replace Pelosi as acting president ex officio.
What would Acting President Nancy Pelosi look like?
I’m definitely no expert in constitutional law, so I don’t actually know what an acting administration would look like. But I’ll try to speculate (and if anyone reading this post has a clearer understanding of presidential succession, please leave a comment below and correct me if I’ve misconstrued anything):
First of all, Pelosi wouldn’t have a vice president, so if she resigned or became incapacitated, the president pro tempore of the Senate would become acting president according to the 1947 Act. For now, that’s Republican Chuck Grassley, but a 50–50 Senate might elect a different senator to fill that role given that there wouldn’t be a majority party in the chamber. Pelosi would also have to resign from Congress to act as president, which would likely make current House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer the next Speaker of a Democratic-controlled House.
Since Pelosi would have all the authority to exercise the powers of an actual president, I believe she would have the power to dismiss political appointees and appoint her own pending the Senate’s approval. But her authority to do anything would most definitely be challenged every step of the way.
Policy-wise, I’m fairly certain nothing would actually pass. The House would remain under Democratic control, but a 50–50 Senate with no vice president to break the tie would probably ensure nothing gets to Pelosi’s desk. I don’t know if Mitch McConnell remains Senate Majority Leader in this scenario, but rest assured he’d do everything in his power to thwart any sort of policymaking by a constitutionally ambiguous government.
Pelosi’s time in the Oval Office might not even be that long, regardless of whether Congress can agree on a new president or not. As per the Twentieth Amendment, Congress could pass a law appointing a different person to serve as acting president or clarifying how long an acting president can serve. Depending on how long the crisis extends, that could mean several acting presidents cycle through the White House.
I don’t even want to think about all of civil unrest that might occur with the results of the presidential election in complete limbo. Trump’s most ardent supporters might take to the streets to decry the deep state’s attempts to usurp the presidency from the sitting president, and I’m sure they would call Pelosi an illegitimate (acting) president. Some in the progressive wing of the Democratic Party would probably adopt the same smug attitude they had in 2016: “if only we had nominated a real progressive like Bernie, then we would’ve won!”
How to avert a constitutional crisis
In the event of a tie in the Electoral College, there are a few ways the country could avoid a potential constitutional crisis that would extend well into 2021. First, though the Supreme Court just ruled that states can require them to vote for their state’s popular vote winner, faithless electors could swing the election in one of two ways. For example, a Republican faithless elector could write in Biden’s name and give him the 270 votes he needs to be elected president. Or, several faithless electors could write in the names of other people, like in 2016. Since the House has to decide between the top three electoral vote–recipients, someone like Colin Powell or John Kasich could wind up with two or three electoral votes, be included in the contingent election, and emerge as a compromise candidate after several ballots (I’m not sure whether President Kasich or Acting President Pelosi is more outlandish).
Faithless electors aside, it’s possible some House members might cross party lines to put an end to the crisis. In this scenario, it’s likely that Biden would have won the popular vote by a decent margin, which could lead several Republicans to use that as justification to defect to Biden. Maybe some House Republicans would just want the Trump nightmare to be over and switch sides knowing that the cost of defecting would be lower without Trump in office to punish them. But I’m not holding my breath that many Republicans would suddenly put country over party. Alternatively, a conservative Democrat like Collin Peterson (MN-7) could flip and deliver another state delegation to Trump, giving him a majority of states.
Even with a 50–50 split, the Senate could still select a vice president before Inauguration Day. Mitt Romney, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski are all senators who have a reputation of bucking their party at times. While unlikely, any one of them could defect and vote for Biden’s running mate. The same could be said about Joe Manchin voting for Pence since he could spin it as reflecting the will of the people of West Virginia, though I imagine he’d balk at being the swing vote.
The Supreme Court would also probably intervene at some point like it did in 2000. I highly doubt that the two-plus months between Election Day and Inauguration Day would pass without the nation’s highest court stepping in to either clarify the process for resolving a contingent election or issuing a ruling tantamount to determining a winner outright—e.g. allowing Pence to cast the tie-breaking vote for himself. There would definitely be cries from both sides about an unelected group of justices dictating election outcomes, but there might not be an alternative.
Concluding thoughts
I don’t want to make it sound like this House of Cards–like scenario is at all likely, nor am I rooting for it in any way. I want Biden to win a decisive Electoral College victory so we can put an end to this nightmare era in American history. But the chances of an Acting President Pelosi are probably slightly greater than either President Evan McMullin or President Gary Johnson in 2016. In other words, slightly greater than zero. The likelier—though still very unlikely—scenario of an Electoral College tie would ultimately bode well for Trump; it would probably mean Biden and other Democrats faltered and the GOP kept its Senate majority and majority of state House delegations, preventing the gridlock that this blog post assumes.
I’m also sort of writing this as a commentary on why the Electoral College is a complete mess and all of the arcane and byzantine methods of resolving a tie need to be—at the very least—reexamined. A national popular vote, for example, would avoid this kind of bizarre fiasco, even if it might require runoff elections. A Twenty-eighth Amendment could update and simplify the nineteenth century rules that govern these situations, like allowing House members to vote individually rather than in state delegations en bloc. I have another blog post in the works about the various ways that could happen, so stay tuned (update: here it is).
Oh boy. It looks as if the results of this election will create somewhat of a muddle which will probably have repercussions here in Australia and everywhere else too. Oh mercy.
LikeLike
You’re all forgetting that Nancy couldn’t take on the role as acting president until the presidential election results are finalized because she too is up for re-election and that disqualifies her. The only candidate that qualifies as acting president (not up for re-election) would be the president pro tempore of the Senate and right now thats Chuck Grassley (R) Iowa.
LikeLike
Congressional elections are independent of the presidential election. In the likely event that Pelosi wins re-election, she’d be eligible as soon as her election is certified by the state of California, even without the presidential election results being finalized.
If that weren’t the case, then the House wouldn’t be able to decide a contingent election in this scenario because none of its members would officially have been elected.
LikeLike
If Pelosi resigns her seat to be acting president, will she get her seat back after all is resolved, or would her appointed replacement retain her seat until a special election could possibly get her back in the house?
LikeLike
No, she wouldn’t. To become acting president, Pelosi would have to resign from the House. After her acting presidency ended, she could run again if she chose to, but she wouldn’t automatically move back into the House.
LikeLike
The problem with this theory that Pelosi would become acting President goes against what is laid out by the 12th amendment. Here is why, first the the there is no Jan. 20th deadline mention in the 12th amendment, but a March 4th deadline. On that deadline the Vice President becomes acting President. no mention of the Speaker of the House. Now if the Senate can not elect a Vice President that office would stay vacant until they do. Without a Vice President all it means is that if something happen to the President or acting President then the order of succession would take place. The constitution does not mandate there to be a vice president in order for our central government to function. Nothing in the constitution or any amendment would override or remove an acting President because there is no Vice President as laid out by the 12th amendment.
LikeLike
The 20th Amendment moved the start of the president’s/VP’s new term from March 4 to January 20, superseding the 12th Amendment. On that date, if the House hasn’t picked a president in a contingent election, then the VP acts as president. But that assumes the Senate elects a VP before January 20.
This post is about if neither chamber picks a winner by January 20, which would mean both the presidency and vice presidency are vacant. As such, the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 dictates that the Speaker of the House would act as president until a president has qualified to hold the office in their own right. In this situation, that would be whenever the House finally resolves the contingent election for president.
The 20th Amendment also says that Congress has the authority to “provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.” That means they could pick someone else to act as president by passing a law.
As far as what would happen if Pelosi were acting as president and the Senate finally picked a VP, there’s plenty of ambiguity. Because the amendments governing succession explicitly give the VP the authority to act as president in this sort of scenario, I’ve interpreted that to mean that the incoming VP, whenever elected by the Senate, would supersede the person currently acting as president and would themselves act as president until the House picked a president to serve in their own right. Of course, that’s just my interpretation, and I’m sure scholars of constitutional law could debate this endlessly.
LikeLike
Without the electoral college. 2 -3 states would decide who’s President. Our founders were Geniuses YOU not so much and they knew that 2-3 states should not be able to decide the President for the whole country.
LikeLike
Deedee, while I agree with you that I’m not a genius, the idea that 2–3 states would decide presidential elections without the Electoral College is fundamentally incorrect and misinformed. I recommend you read any of the several posts on this blog about the problems with the Electoral College if you care to dig deeper into the issue:
https://politicstheorypractice.com/2016/02/28/the-case-against-the-electoral-college/
https://politicstheorypractice.com/2016/02/29/the-case-against-the-electoral-college-part-2/
https://politicstheorypractice.com/2020/07/10/is-there-a-feasible-alternative-to-the-electoral-college/
https://politicstheorypractice.com/2016/11/09/what-happened-and-what-happens-next/
LikeLike
And NO Pence is not in play as the associated ticket did not win.So on the 20th at 12:00 he is not vice president any longer. SEE COOLIDGE and Haze era.
LikeLike
Actually, Pence is. With a tie in the Electoral College, he would be one of the top two vote-getters for VP, so the Senate would choose between him and Harris in a separate contingent election. If the Senate voted to make Pence VP—independent of whatever the House decides—he would be acting president starting 1/20/21 until the House could choose between Trump and Biden. If the House picked Biden in this scenario, then Pence would be Biden’s VP.
What I specifically referred to in this post is a situation where a deadlocked Senate couldn’t decide its own contingent election for VP before 1/20/21. In that case, without a president or a VP, Pelosi would act as president (as per the Presidential Succession Act of 1947) until either the Senate picked a VP to act as president or the House picked a president.
LikeLike
Your leaving out the HUGE PRESEDENT and history.This scenario has happened 3 x in America already (i.e. Thomas Jefferson and Rutherford B.Haze) All speakers of the house or put in by the house. Pelosi would have tremendous authority in 9 of the 10 possible scenario above.
LikeLike
I mentioned the three contingent elections in the post: 1800, 1824, and 1836. In each of those three instances, Congress decided the contingent election before Inauguration Day (which back then was in March). This post is about what would happen if Congress couldn’t decide before Inauguration Day, which would leave the country without an elected president or VP.
Also, Rutherford B. Hayes was not elected via a contingent election in 1876; there was controversy surrounding the electoral votes of several states, and Congress created an electoral commission to resolve the dispute. The commission picked Hayes despite Tilden winning the popular vote because of the Compromise of 1877 that ultimately ended Reconstruction.
I’m not sure what you’re referring to regarding Pelosi, but the Speaker of the House is second in the presidential line of succession as per the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, so that’s where she comes in. There’s disagreement over whether the Speaker (and the President pro tempore of the Senate) are constitutionally eligible to act as president, but as the law currently stands, she would act as president if neither chamber could resolve a contingent election by 1/20/21.
LikeLike
The 12th amendment states what happens if the house can not reach a decision for President. Read it and it clearly states the Vice President becomes the acting President (regardless if the senate can select a vice president or not). The succession act has nothing to do with the 12th amendment. Pelosi (or Pseaker of the House) would only become President is the President or acting President can not carry out their duties.
Just because the Senate does not chose a vice president does that override or remove the acting President as directed by the 12th amendment. Which again states it is the Vice President.
LikeLike
The process as outlined by the 12th Amendment refers to the VP-elect, not the sitting VP, whose term would be over after January 20. Pence’s term as VP ends on 1/20/21, so he would no longer be VP in a scenario where neither chamber resolved their contingent elections by that date. In that case, since both offices would be vacant, Pelosi would act as president pursuant to the 1947 Succession Act.
Pence could still return to the vice presidency if the Senate elected him via contingent election, and in that scenario I believe he would supersede Pelosi as acting president until the House elected a president to serve in their own right. But, assuming a contingent election weren’t resolved before 1/20/21, Pence would no longer hold the office of VP unless/until the Senate elected him.
LikeLike
If Biden is elected, then found to be unfit, and Harris wishes to remain vice president, could Pelosi become president without another election?
LikeLike
By virtue of being VP, Harris would succeed Biden if he left office for any reason. If Biden resigned, Harris would become president. If Biden were removed in accordance with Section 4 of the 25th Amendment, Harris would become Acting President until either Biden was found to be fit for office again or Congress intervened.
Harris would have to resign if she didn’t want to succeed Biden in any capacity. That could happen in two ways: resign outright and pass the presidency to Speaker Pelosi, or appoint a VP and then resign, leaving the presidency to that person.
LikeLike
Thank you for your clarification on these possibilities.
It is going to be interesting to say the least.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting and detailed hypotheticals on the upcoming november election. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 2 people